There is an issue with the cache - please press Control + F5clear browsing data to refresh fully and display correctly. Thank you!
Why Date Unvaxxed?
Created on: 2025-05-17
Modified on: 2025-05-19
Why we refused the vax; dating; and prize draw
Why should you - if you dodged the covid shots - join Unjibbed?
Firstly, Unjibbed is a network exclusively for those who refused ALL covid vaccines. It works primarily as a dating site, but can also be used to find friends and host events for this community.
Why we refused the vax
For most people, vaxxed or unvaxxed, covid is in the past - though we should not forget what happened. But let's cast our eyes quickly back over the whole covid response.
In Spring 2020 there was of course the sudden spike in deaths, primarily among the elderly. But there were serious questions raised by orthodox doctors about the protocols used, e.g. the ventilators, and the drug protocols.
Dr Cameron Kyle-Sidell's warning to his fellow doctors early in the pandemic.
Dr Kyle-Sidell's warning about ventilators was swiftly removed from YouTube, but a change in protocol soon afterwards confirmed what he warned about. Similarly, there are major controversies around the drug protocols used, and these too were changed. As such, it is a matter of debate how many of the initial wave of deaths were caused or contributed to by bad treatment protocols.
Also viable treatments, again supported by many doctors, were suppressed. The first of these to gain prominence was hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). In 2020, many people, when they heard "HCQ," responded with, "That's Trump's favourite drug, and I don't like Trump," or, "That's really dangerous."
But Trump's support of it is entirely irrelevant. All that matters is the medical evidence. As to the purported danger and failure of the drug -
The controversy was supposed to be settled by the Surgisphere papers, which looked at all of the evidence and came up with a summary. And the summary was: it killed more people than it saved. Everyone remembers those headlines. Game over for HCQ. Except . . .
. . . the Surgisphere papers were later revealed as a fraud. They were then withdrawn from the medical journals that had published them. Even Dr Horton - editor of the Lancet - commented that:
"This is a shocking example of research misconduct in the middle of a global health emergency." - Dr Horton, editor, The Lancet.
But this never got the same publicity as the original scare stories, so the media hit campaign had worked for the majority of the population. Despite this, there is strong evidence that HCQ, when used correctly, did indeed save lives, especially when used in combination with other treatments.
It was similar with ivermectin (IVM). The "horse paste" argument was as irrelevant as the Trump argument against HCQ. The actual evidence in favour of IVM is insurmountable. I challenge anyone who doubts this to read Dr. Kory's book on the matter with an open mind.
In sum, we had a medical emergency caused by a virus created in a laboratory (as is now widely accepted), made worse by dangerous medical protocols, and the criminal withholding of effective orthodox medicines, which could have ended the pandemic before the vaccines even came out. And when they did come out, orthodox medical literature showed they did not diminish transmission.
So there was never a medical or moral argument for compulsory vaccination. Getting oneself vaccinated did not protect anyone else. But there were significant risks associated with these injections.
Excess Mortality as reported by the Society of Actuaries (SOA). Note the dramatic increase in young adults in Q3 of 2021, coinciding with mandatory vaccination for many American workers.
Those of us who refused the jabs knew most or all of the above, and much more evidence besides, when we made our decisions not to get vaccinated.
Personally I have medical articles on this, printed out during the course of the pandemic, piled up in my house, and several thorough books on the matter. This is standard in the unvaxxed community.
These debates were often heated during 2020-3. Now the dust has settled. To those who took the injections, we wish you well. If you're in good health, we celebrate it. Many were not so lucky.
However, this site is specifically for those who declined all covid vaccines.
Dating
When it comes to finding romantic partners, the unvaccinated have every reason to seek each other.
There are dating sites for every imaginable niche. Fans of certain authors have their own dating sites. Fans of specific music genres have their own dating sites.
At Unjibbed, we're united by something more profound. During covid, the media hit us with an unrelenting psychological campaign of fear. In the early days, there was confusion and panic, but those of us who refused to comply are united in figuring out that something wasn't right about what we were told, at some point before we were offered the injections.
Many of us who stood together during this time had our backs to the wall. Many risked loss of work, and financial oblivion when we refused to take an experimental biologic released on Emergency Use Authorisation.
We tried our best to warn families and friends about the injections and so on. Most of the time we were unable to get through, and many of us know or knew someone, or several people, who were sadly harmed, or even killed by these shots. (See SOA chart above for the tip of the iceberg of evidence of harms.)
We were pilloried in the press, castigated by politicians, and often alienated by the friends and colleagues who we tried to warn of the unnecessary risks they were taking.
And we collectively faced down very real attempts at universal compulsory vaccination with these experimental biologics. This is a benefit to society as a whole in terms of health, economics, and civil liberties.
That we went through all of these things, and remained resolute, shows incredible strength of character and foresight - important qualities to seek in romantic partners.
Image creator unknown, but appreciated.
Plus there are ongoing safety concerns, particularly with reproductive health for both males and females.
And if you're getting involved with someone, one day you might be discussing the medical needs of your offspring. It helps if both partners are informed and on the same page on these issues before they even meet.
All in all, if you're "unvaxxed" - if you declined the covid shots - then this is the place for you.
Site Update
There are plenty of members in the UK, and the site is fully operational here. For the rest of the world, there’s not yet a payment solution, which means it’s not fully operational outside of the UK. I’m actively seeking a global solution for this, and hope to have this solved soon. Wherever you are in the world, I invite you to join.
But if you’re in the UK, unvaxxed, and looking to meet others, I especially encourage you to join.
How to work this site for success
I read on a blog about dating recently: "The bar on dating sites is in hell. Men get bonus points just for having their shirt on and completing their profiles."
On shirt on or off: I've seen a few female profiles on respectable dating sites where the woman wears a bikini in her photo, and most people accept that, so I'm not going to judge men for also using beach photos.
But on completing profiles - this is a real issue. And I can tell you, it's not just men. A significant proportion of men and women join, but never complete their profile.
(To be fair, I raised the number of required answers in December to improve the quality of profiles overall, and contacted anyone affected, though some of those older profiles are still incomplete. If that's you, why not complete it now? I see some great profiles here that are literally just one or two answers away from completion.)
Others get as far as uploading a photo, but no further. On most dating sites, they'd still be able to connect with others, but that's not how this site works.
One of the problems on mainstream dating sites is, all members are visible to all other members - with the consequence that often, the women are inundated by too many messages from men who are not what they're looking for.
The women then stop reading their messages, so even when an ideal match finds them and messages them, those messages are not even opened. It's a lose-lose situation.
So this site uses a mutual-match algorithm - everyone can set filters to narrow who they're looking for - and people only find each other when both people pass each other's filters.
So the "bonus points for completing their profile" issue vanishes. You'll only ever see complete profiles on this site.
There are enough members in the small country of the UK for probably most people here to connect with at least one other potential match. But you'll need a complete profile to be in the race!
Prize Draw
Meanwhile, there's a prize draw for members in the UK. I'm doing this partly to encourage anyone who hasn't yet done so to complete their profile. By doing so, not only could you meet someone gorgeous, but you could also win a book!
The book is "Busting Anti-Vax Myths", a satire on all things covidian. Covid, the response, and the fallout are all serious matters, but a light way to puncture irrational arguments is through humour, and this book does that in spades. From the Burkean's review:
If you have a weakened heart or nervous tremors brought on from a Covid vaccine you might have taken recently, then this book is not for you: you’ll laugh so much you could easily find yourself being put out of your misery for good!
This is a long overdue and very welcome satire on the madness we have all had to endure for the past number of years after the mysterious release of a man-made gain-of-function virus, the resulting efforts of Big Pharma to increase its profits at all costs and the widespread instigation of criminal anti-democratic agendas in so many once-liberal countries. . . .
I have a copy of this to give away to one entrant who will be chosen at random.
Rules for entry:
- You must have a complete profile indicating you are looking for dating.
- Textual answers must be the usual minimum length, but texts like "I'll fill this in later," are not eligible.
- Your profile must not show any warnings when saved.
- You must be based in the UK.
- To enter, email "support@unjibbed.com", with the subject line, "ENTER DRAW", by May 31st.
That's all for now, good luck for everyone entering the draw.
- Antony
Notes
: Covid-19: Lancet retracts paper that halted hydroxychloroquine trials, Guardian, 4th June 2020
: Hundreds of studies have been performed on HCQ since 2020, and collated here: HCQ for COVID-19, 423 studies with >500,000 patients, hc19hcq.org. For a recent example of a primary source, see: He, et al., Low dose of hydroxychloroquine is associated with reduced COVID-19 mortality: a multicenter study in China, Frontiers of Medicine, Mar 2025
: Kory, The War on Ivermectin, 2023
: While the mRNA biologics (Pfizer and Moderna) are certainly gene therapies, it is controversial whether they are rightly also classed as vaccines. Emeritus Professor Angus Dalgliesh, for instance, has unequivocally stated that they are not vaccines. For this reason, covid "vaccine" is often put in quotes. The naming of these biologics as vaccines was likely primarily for marketing purposes (public trust in vaccines was generally high, whereas who would accept a gene therapy?) and for legal protections vaccines have, over and above other medicines.
: Singanayagam, et al., Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study, Lancet, 28th Oct 2021
: Society of Actuaries, Group Life COVID-19 Mortality Survey Report, Aug 2022
: Dodsworth, A State of Fear, 2021
: Bannister, Irish Covid Satire? Review ‘Busting Anti-Vax Myths: Seriously EXPERT Arguments for the Covid-Deniers in Your Life’, Burkean, 7th August 2023